TRUMP’S TRIALS EXPOSE THE FRGILITY OF U.S. DEMOCRACY. And this is the country that unilaterally decides on the legitimacy of governments throughout the world.

Trump
is facing 4 trials with 88 felony counts. Yet 3 of them are being held up
despite their relative simplicity from a legal viewpoint. The strongest case
against Trump involves illegal handling of highly classified documents. But the
judge, a Trump appointee whose only “qualification” was her membership in the
Federalist Society, has delayed the trial as have two others along with the
help of the Republican dominated Supreme Court, three of whose 9 judges were
appointed by Trump.

But
what really shows how fragile U.S. democracy is has to do with the one trial
which is really not that damning and which Trump has a lot going for him. The
main proof that Trump failed to accurately report the wiring of $130,000 of
hush money to a porn star is former Trump trickster Michael Cohen whose
credibility can easily be questioned by Trump’s lawyer.

But
the absurdity of it all is that the outcome of the 2024 presidential elections
rests on the decision of the 12 members of the jury in this case. If they
choose to condemn Trump, it is probable that he will lose the election since
many voters will refrain from voting for a felon. If they don’t convict him, he
will probably (if current surveys are any indication) be elected president.
That such an earthshattering decision as to who will govern the U.S. for the
next 4 years rests on these 12 individuals in such a relatively flimsy case talks volumes
about the deterioration of U.S. democracy. That is, the presidential election
of a man who says shoplifters should be shot rests on a feeble accusation. 

This is a clear demonstration that the U.S. lacks the credibility to decide unilaterally what
governments are legitimate and which are not, and whether the people of those
countries will get starved into submission (through international sanctions). In fact, no country under any
circumstances should have that right.